horns: joe hill
I'm begining to feel like joe hill has a penchant for making extremely unlikeable
characters. I've read a couple of his novels and they all seem to write the protagonist as
like. wow! this guy sucks! but the person they are up against sucks more!! horns felt like
that premise but with a generous dollop of shock.. humor? horror? thrown in that got stale
about 50 pages in. I think it had an interesting premise but man I could not get myself to
care about anyone in this book.
the handyman method: nick cutter, andrew f. sullivan
read for a horror book club! this was a solid four stars for about 2/3 of the book, then
abruptly towards the end a new plot element is introduced that kind of dampens the satire of
the Alpha Male TM that the book unsubtly deals with. there's an interesting seed here, as a
guy who loves haunted house horror where the horror Is The House Itself, but in turning the
short story that was the inspiration into a full length novel a lot of extra themes were
added that muddied the waters. could have been better had the plotlines been tightened up a
bit. still, I tore through it in an afternoon because the descriptions and visuals were
gripping.
the big book of virginia ghost stories: l. b. Taylor jr.
I realized halfway through this book that I've read it already, back in college when I was
checking out every single book about ghosts or occult shit I could find out of the library.
it's just okay. published in 2010, so nothing really recent; and there's a good chunk of
stories in here that have no relations to ghosts. still interesting to refresh myself on
(relatively) local ghost stories.
a pale view of hills: kazuo ishiguro
october 2024's bookbug pick. I don't think I "got" this book until the last 10 or so pages,
and even then it took me reading some other reviews to fully understand. but once I did, I
realized how clever it was. hauntingly beautiful prose with many layers to the story. read
my full review on my bookbug page
here
one hundred years of solitude: gabriel garcía márquez
september 2024's bookbug pick. peak fiction. the entire breadth of human emotion is in these
~400 pages, blended masterfully with the supernatural that has become natural. honestly I
wrote a lot on my bookbug page so read my review
here
the stranger beside me: ann rule
a book that's been on my radar for a while since horror brushes shoulders with the true
crime genre every now and then. finally got around to reading it, was floored by some of the
details of the case I wasn't familiar with (namely, how long ted bundy was able to postpone
his execution). certainly a unique perspective on bundy, and the additions I had in my copy
of the book from rule updating every handful of years were appreciated.
the grip of it: jac jemc
jemc's writing is concise and crisp; chapters pass in the span of a breath. things get more
and more progressively unhinged. in some respects it felt like a trimmed down house of
leaves and I say that positively. the ending was unsatisfying and not in a "I'm gonna be
pondering this for the next few days" way.
20th century ghosts: joe hill
as with most anthologies, there were some good stories and some bad to mediocre ones. there
were a handful that weren't even horror adjacent. "deadwood" stuck with me for some reason,
despite only being a page long. something about it was fantastically evocative.
pnin: vladimir nabokov
august's bookbug pick. a short
and charming little novel. the titular pnin often finds himself in unfortunate situations,
but his quirks make him someone I have to root for. read my initial review
here
it: stephen king
I'm so torn on this book. like there were really high highs and also really low lows. I
think the length (1168 pages) is to its detriment. there were parts that could have been
trimmed. beverly deserved so, So much better. I think the concept of It as this cosmic evil
is really cool but the book didn't focus as much on it as I would have liked. also I feel
like the scene in the sewers that happens 90% of the way in the book with the kids was
incredibly offputting and if I wasn't almost finished with the book at that point I probably
would have dropped it. take that how you will.
the hundred secret senses: amy tan
picked this up as a "blind date with a book" package I saw at a local fair. thought the
supernatural elements were interesting and I liked the interweaving of the two stories being
told but I thought the ending was a letdown.
to the lighthouse: virginia woolf
read for july's bookbug pick.
not my favorite of the books so far for that group, although as time goes on and I'm
meditating on it more I like it more. read my initial review
here
strangers on a train: patricia highsmith
read for june's bookbug pick.
overall I enjoyed this book as a fun, quick thriller. read my review
here
azarinth healer: book one: rhaegar
read for geega's community book club. I thought it was Just Ok. finding out that it was a
serialized web novel make sense because uh. there sure didn't seem to be any overarching
plot. still the rpg setting was easy and entertaining to read about.
the master and margarita: mikhail bulgakov
read for may's bookbug pick. a
little confusing, but super interesting in the latter half. read my review
here
a collapse of horses: brian evenson
a horror anthology where the stories stop just short of giving the full picture. very
evocative imagery. I liked "the dust" for being the most fleshed out, and "any corpse" for
being unexpectedly funny.
the doctor who fooled the world: brian deer
a nonfiction book about the fraud study that led to mass paranoia about vaccines, and the
doctor who pushed it through. interesting stuff, but somewhat dense at times
the ruins: scott smith
a horror novel about a vacation in mexico gone horribly wrong after the tourists venture nto
the jungle. I thought it was miserable but in a fun way LOL. more sad than scary imo. and
sometimes I am in the mood for media that will suck the soul out of me
the hunger: alma katsu
a horror novel that is a fictionalized retelling of the donner party's unfortunate end. I
think I expected this book to be more gruesome and it ends up being more sad and
contemplative than gory. I'm also not a huge fan of historical fiction so I think even being
interested in the topic it just didn't hit.